New Rectenna To Convert Wasted Energy from Your Microwave Into Electricity

by Jaymi Heimbuch

December 13, 2011

This device converts wasted microwave energy to energy you can use

Summary: The new "Microwave Regenerative Converter is a device that makes use of the energy wasted by your microwave. The product has yet to be released to the market. It will be advertised for everyday household use. The price and usefulness of the product aren't known yet, but it is apparent that the efficiency of the device will vary greatly by different foods and microwaves. This device is a rectenna, a device that has been around for years, but never before has it been used for such a purpose. The device is said to be small and easy to use.

Reflection: This product by itself doesn't seem to be too groundbreaking. How much energy can really be harvested from your microwave? But the idea here is what's interesting. Scientists continue to come up with new ways to create cleaner energy and make things more efficient. While this product is a step in the right direction, I think the only way for it to make a significant impact would be if it were distributed in mass, as in having one on every new microwave, or if it could create energy from multiple appliances. I can connect this article to Diane's one about using bodies as fuel, as they both are unique ways to create alternative energy.

Questions:

1. Would you buy this for your microwave? Why or why not?

2. How could this idea be improved upon?

3. What are some other ideas for alternative energy that you can think of?

To avert disaster, protect our natural resources By: Jingkang Gao published: Saturday 1 am July 31st, 2010

http://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/To-avert-disaster-protect-our-natural-resources-597682.php

The picture shows harmful chemicals being released into the air.

The article i read talks about how our natural resources are being tremendously overused and the effects they have on our environment. He talks about the Marcellus Shale which is a long strip of land that contains approximately 150 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It extends from Ohio and West Virginia to the Catskills. The positive about this is that there is an abundant amount of natural gas for the U.S. to use. The negative is that parts of the shale are located very close to lakes and reservoirs that supply fresh water to NYC and parts of the upper states. Margin for error in these areas is non existent. The slightest mess up could harm many people. The author also talks about the oil spill that recently happened on the Gulf of Mexico and how it is "painfully obvious that we ought to immediately correct our fatally flawed system of living, a system determined to forever abuse seemingly unlimited natural resources." He says that strategic use of these resources could turn out to be disastrous.

I completely agree with a lot of what the author has written. We have been living like the resources we have today will be here forever by wasteful use of them. Also i agree with the dangers that the resources have on our environment. In the article the author talks about searching for "green investments". The damage fracking does to our land and waters, the damage coal's chemicals has on our air as well as natural gas is hurting us. It is important that we preserve these resources but we have to come up with ideas on how to obtain these resources, and use these resources without harming the environment we live in. When the author wrote about the Marcellus Shale it reminded me of the movie we were watching today in class and how contaminated the water is that people have been drinking. This can ultimately become deadly and dangerous to humans that consume. If we cannot get these resources without harming the environment and the people and animals that live in the environment then we are going to have to find other resources that re before we destroy the earth we are living on.

Questions:

1) Do we have any plans for our future on new resources?

2) When will the Marcellus Shale begin to contaminate the water that we use here in Hatboro and Horhsham?

3) Is there anything like the Marcellus Shale in other countries around the world?

Nonrenewable Resources are Running Out

Nonrenewable resources
By Sue Lynn Carty
Article Link: http://greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Non_Renewable_Resources

The picture to the left shows the energry consumption from 2006. The ones that are most consumed are nonrenewable resources.











Summary: Nonrenewable resources are "energy sources that we use and consume faster then nature produces them." It is expected that the natural gas supply will run out within the next 35 years. Because of our ability to easily obtain these sources and get them in mass quantities, we use so much so fast. Eventually, there will be no nonrenewable resources left for us to use. Oil and coal are two major resources used, and are almost none that could replace them easily. Oil and coal are the most common ones, but aluminum, copper, silver, gold, and diamonds are also going to run out in the close future. After being brought to our attention, people started changing their ways to help conserve energy, but as of now these nonrenewable resources are a necessity and there has yet to be another option created for when we run out.

Opinion/ Reflection: I think we need to come up with a backup plan for when we run out because if these are as important as everyone is saying we wont be able to live the same way without them. Hopefully, by the time we run out there will be a better way to use our resources and not waste anything. The pollution it can cause is insane as well. Fossil fuels can release carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and sulfur oxides into the air and some can cause smog. Smog can cause lung irritation, irritation to the eyes, nose and throat, worsen existing respiratory and heart conditions, shortness of breath, and permanent lung damage over time. The burning of fossil fuels can be very dangerous. I believe there needs to be a better way to get energy so we don't put lives and major cities/states at risk. It's scary to think something that is so necessary to the way we live could possibly run out in your lifetime, but something definitely needs to happen before so it doesn't result in a tragedy.

Questions:
1) If we run out of these resources how big of an impact will it have on us?
2) Is there anyway to create, duplicate, or preserve oil, coal or other major resources?
3) Environmentalists are always talking about how driving less, turning off the lights, solar pannels, and more are helping the use of the nonrenewable resources go down. Does this actually have an effect on how quickly the nonrenewable resources will run out?

Feds: Pay attention to drilling in Pa., elsewhere (No Author Found) Date Displayed : December 7th, 2011

Link of article : http://online.wsj.com/article/APc48cb888a1a5458ba824533a7bd3b6f7.html



The picture shown here to right is a map of the Marcellus Shale, which has shifted over the years and is now beneath Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and New York. Pennsylvania is the center of Fracking for Natural Gas within these states.







Summary :
This article talks about how Fracking is a huge problem. Environmentalists believe that fracking can poision the water supply, but the natural gas industries have told them other wise that "it's been used safely for several decades." This report was issued Nov 18 and since then nothing has been done about it. It stated that over the summer there had been several meetings discussing the impacts of fracking and that the environmental concerns are not getting enough attention for this problem. Also, it stated that there has been some improvement in areas, but barely any. The summary had also stated that there is a big risk of environmental consequences that could delay or stop the fracking for natural gas. Eventually they believe if we keep this ongoing that the shale gas production will be expanded across the United States and there could be as many as 100,000 wells within the next decade.

Opinion :
I believe that we should cut down on the amounts of Fracking done in Pennsylvania. Here in this state it's a big problem. If this problem gets any bigger than what it is, it could eventually become a problem across the whole country instead of just one area. Personally, I don't want our drinking water to be poisioned and I'm sure others in this state and states around us don't want that either. There is already enough we don't know about our drinking water that has the potentially to kill us, and fracking could just be another factor to add onto it.


Questions :
Have they come up with any other alternative ways for fracking? If so what?

Besides areas on the east coast, are there any other regions within the United States that have a huge Fracking problem or is only here?

How long has the problem been ongoing for and if it's been for long periods of time, why hasn't someone come up with some insightful solution?

Do they expect the Marcellus Shale to shift again? Could if have a negative or positive impact on our region if it does?

Crematorium to Generate Energy from Burned Corpses

Crematorium to Generate Energy from Burned Corpses
by Brian Merchant
December 1, 2011
http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/crematorium-generate-clean-energy.html




Picture: This relates to the story because the story is about cremating dead bodies in order to have a renewable source  of energy.

Summary: In the U.K. a crematorium decided to come up with a unique energy source. With all the thermal energy given off while cremating a body, they are turning it into usable energy. They are installing three burners. Two will provide enough energy to power 1,500 televisions. One of the burners will be for to provide heat for the chapel and offices. What inspired them to "go green" was the U.K. efficiency standards.

Reflection: In my opinion, this is a good way to use less of our non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels. It is an unconventional type of alternative energy. Obviously people die all the time, 1.8 people die every second according to yahoo answers, so there's always going to be more corpses to burn and it will always be renewable. I don't think anyone would really like to hear that when they die if they are cremated they are a source of energy, however, you won't really be able to tell if you're dead.

Questions:
1.) Is there a way for the U.S. to do this?
2.) Is there a way to get more energy out of it?
3.) If U.K. is starting to force everyone to go green and having efficiency standards for industries, does that mean the rest of the world will soon start doing the same?
4.) How can other people use what they do for a living into a good way to help the environment?


P.S. Sorry if this is offensive to anyones religious beliefs, it was the first article I found that didn't bore me =/